<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>These Things Matter To Me &#187; rivalry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesethingsmattertome.com/category/rivalry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com</link>
	<description>let&#039;s turn that enterprise frown upside down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>JayZ vs. Nas; VMware vs. Parallels. VMware answers Parallels Coherence with Unity. Mac virtualization gets competitive</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivalry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x76]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(No they didn&#8217;t. No they did not just use C&#038;C Music Factory in this video. They did. )
Aside from the ridic soundtrack, this video is compelling.
Yes, VMware Fusion is already available for free (in Beta).  But this video shows features not currently available in the beta that you can download right now.  Most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JIApJMzGzDQ"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JIApJMzGzDQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><br />(No they didn&#8217;t. No they did not just use C&#038;C Music Factory in this video. They did. )</span></p>
<p>Aside from the ridic soundtrack, this video is compelling.</p>
<p>Yes, <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/beta/fusion/">VMware Fusion</a> is already available for free (in Beta).  But this video shows features <span style="font-style: italic;">not currently available</span> in the beta that you can download right now.  Most notable is that VMware Fusion has responded to and one-upped <a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/">Parallels Desktop</a>&#8217;s ability to have each Windows application be its own little window in OS X, rather than have one &#8220;parent&#8221; window host all guest applications.</p>
<p>Parallels calls this &#8220;<a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/coherence/">coherence</a>.&#8221;  VMware Fusion calls this &#8220;unity.&#8221;  They&#8217;re pretty much the same, except that VMware Fusion can have each window appear individually in OS X&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/expose/">Expose</a> feature, something Parallels does not.</p>
<p>That said, Parallels is fully released, and VMware Fusion is not. And the unity feature doesn&#8217;t exist in the beta that&#8217;s out.  Add to that the fact that VMware hasn&#8217;t announced how much/ if it will charge for VMware Fusion (its  features are positioned between the free <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/player/">VMware Player</a>, and $189 <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/ws/">VMware Workstation</a>).</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://digg.com/videos/educational/VMware_Fusion_shows_how_the_big_boys_do_it">Comments from the Digg people</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
