<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>These Things Matter To Me &#187; fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesethingsmattertome.com/category/fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com</link>
	<description>let&#039;s turn that enterprise frown upside down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sun buying Virtualbox-maker Innotek</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2008/02/12/sun-buying-virtualbox-maker-innotek/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2008/02/12/sun-buying-virtualbox-maker-innotek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innotek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Screenshot of a Windows guest in a Mac OS X host, using VirtualBox)
Most Ubuntu users have long known about Virtualbox, the confusingly-versioned (they have an &#8220;open source&#8221; version, and a &#8220;full&#8221; (their word, not fine) version ) VMware Workstation-like tool.  It&#8217;s been in Ubuntu repositories for a while, and I like it quite a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.virtualbox.org/staticpages/VirtualBox_OSX_beta_3.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 330px; height: 206px;" src="http://www.virtualbox.org/staticpages/VirtualBox_OSX_beta_3.png" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">(Screenshot of a Windows guest in a Mac OS X host, using VirtualBox)</span></p>
<p>Most Ubuntu users have long known about Virtualbox, the <a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions">confusingly-versioned</a> (they have an &#8220;open source&#8221; version, and a &#8220;full&#8221; (their word, not fine) version ) VMware Workstation-like tool.  It&#8217;s been in Ubuntu repositories for a while, and I like it quite a bit, though it&#8217;s never displaced VMware Workstation in my life.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been especially excited about the fact that they have a beta version of VirtualBox for the Mac, making it so users on all major platforms can have a similar experience and trade virtual machines around.(Yeah, I know that VMware Fusion virtual machines are pretty much interchangeable with VMware Workstation/ VMware Player machines, but there is no free VMware product for Mac users, so I hate having to check ahead/download trials for users, etc).</p>
<p>In any case, <a href="http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-02/sunflash.20080212.1.xml">Sun is buying Innotek</a>, and I think it&#8217;s great.  Let&#8217;s hope they don&#8217;t pour Java into it! (just kidding. kind of.)  One thing that I think has hurt Sun is that it doens&#8217;t make consumer products. Something Microsoft benefits from, and now VMware, is that consumer behaviors drive corporate decisions. People achieve consumer comfort with a product, and extend the relationship at work.  Sun&#8217;s Scott McNealy would just rail against Microsoft quality.  It&#8217;s not always about quality!  It&#8217;s about not wanting to venture into the unknown. Sun having an easy to use desktop product like VirtualBox is actually pretty unique for them, and a really great change.  (Apologies if they make all sorts of other consumer apps I don&#8217;t know about.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2008/02/12/sun-buying-virtualbox-maker-innotek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First post-Leopard VMware Fusion release is out, plus new tool: VMware Importer for moving Windows VM&#8217;s from Parallels to VMware Fusion</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/11/12/first-post-leopard-vmware-fusion-release-is-out-plus-new-tool-vmware-importer-for-moving-windows-vms-from-parallels-to-vmware-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/11/12/first-post-leopard-vmware-fusion-release-is-out-plus-new-tool-vmware-importer-for-moving-windows-vms-from-parallels-to-vmware-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google techtalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[importer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization ben gertzfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware importer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw a tweet from VMware Fusion developer Ben Gertzfield:
VMware Fusion 1.1 and VMware Importer (Parallels to VMware) beta are out!
Looking over the release dates, it looks like this is the first post-Leopard release of VMware Fusion, so if you have Leopard, you especially want to grab this.
Then there&#8217;s VMware Importer, a new, beta tool [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.stirredup.net/files/computer-love_th.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 327px; height: 283px;" src="http://www.stirredup.net/files/computer-love_th.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Just saw <a href="http://twitter.com/bgertzfield/statuses/407414142">a tweet</a> from VMware Fusion developer <span class="fn"><a href="http://infusion.vox.com/">Ben Gertzfield</a>:<br /></span><br />
<blockquote>VMware Fusion 1.1 and VMware Importer (Parallels to VMware) beta are out!</p></blockquote>
<p>Looking over the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/">release dates</a>, it looks like this is the first post-Leopard release of VMware Fusion, so if you have Leopard, you especially want to grab this.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/importer_tool.html">VMware Importer</a>, a new, beta tool for converting your Parallels guests to VMware (Fusion) guests.  The docs say it works with Windows guests (Windows 2000, XP, 2003, and Vista), and that because enough info about  your (virtual) hardware will change during the conversion process (just in terms  of identifiers I assume, not actual profile), you&#8217;ll probably need to reactivate you Windows license upon conversion.</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re talking about Macs, VMware Fusion, and Ben Gertzfield, I might as well link to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJPq_8ULpRg">a pretty cool (video) Google TechTalk Ben gave about VMware Fusion</a>. It&#8217;s about an hour, and the first 10 minutes are the standard talking points VMware gives about &#8220;it&#8217;s about apps,&#8221; etc, etc. But at about minute 11 it gets very interesting as Ben talks about how VMware approached certain Mac-specific problems.<br /><span class="on down" style="display: block;" id="formatbar_CreateLink" title="Link" onmouseover="ButtonHoverOn(this);" onmouseout="ButtonHoverOff(this);" onmouseup="" onmousedown="CheckFormatting(event);FormatbarButton('richeditorframe', this, 8);ButtonMouseDown(this);"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/11/12/first-post-leopard-vmware-fusion-release-is-out-plus-new-tool-vmware-importer-for-moving-windows-vms-from-parallels-to-vmware-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JayZ vs. Nas; VMware vs. Parallels. VMware answers Parallels Coherence with Unity. Mac virtualization gets competitive</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivalry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x76]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(No they didn&#8217;t. No they did not just use C&#038;C Music Factory in this video. They did. )
Aside from the ridic soundtrack, this video is compelling.
Yes, VMware Fusion is already available for free (in Beta).  But this video shows features not currently available in the beta that you can download right now.  Most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JIApJMzGzDQ"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JIApJMzGzDQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><br />(No they didn&#8217;t. No they did not just use C&#038;C Music Factory in this video. They did. )</span></p>
<p>Aside from the ridic soundtrack, this video is compelling.</p>
<p>Yes, <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/beta/fusion/">VMware Fusion</a> is already available for free (in Beta).  But this video shows features <span style="font-style: italic;">not currently available</span> in the beta that you can download right now.  Most notable is that VMware Fusion has responded to and one-upped <a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/">Parallels Desktop</a>&#8217;s ability to have each Windows application be its own little window in OS X, rather than have one &#8220;parent&#8221; window host all guest applications.</p>
<p>Parallels calls this &#8220;<a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/coherence/">coherence</a>.&#8221;  VMware Fusion calls this &#8220;unity.&#8221;  They&#8217;re pretty much the same, except that VMware Fusion can have each window appear individually in OS X&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/expose/">Expose</a> feature, something Parallels does not.</p>
<p>That said, Parallels is fully released, and VMware Fusion is not. And the unity feature doesn&#8217;t exist in the beta that&#8217;s out.  Add to that the fact that VMware hasn&#8217;t announced how much/ if it will charge for VMware Fusion (its  features are positioned between the free <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/player/">VMware Player</a>, and $189 <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/ws/">VMware Workstation</a>).</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://digg.com/videos/educational/VMware_Fusion_shows_how_the_big_boys_do_it">Comments from the Digg people</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2007/06/06/jayz-vs-nas-vmware-vs-parallels-vmware-answers-parallels-coherence-with-unity-mac-virtualization-gets-competitive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels to VMware: It&#8217;s On!</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/12/04/parallels-to-vmware-its-on/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/12/04/parallels-to-vmware-its-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[               
Click To Play
          

(demo video via  video blogger Michael Verdi and blip.tv) 
Wowza&#8230; So&#8230; Parallels for Mac OS X has been out a for a bit. But it&#8217;s previously been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center>               <script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&#038;posts_id=113251&amp;source=3&#038;autoplay=true&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;file_type=flv&#038;player_width=&amp;player_height="></script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_113251"><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/MichaelVerdi-Parallels367.flv" onclick="play_blip_movie_113251(); return false;"><img src="http://blip.tv/file/get/MichaelVerdi-Parallels367.flv.jpg" title="Click To Play" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/MichaelVerdi-Parallels367.flv" onclick="play_blip_movie_113251(); return false;">Click To Play</a></div>
<p>          </center>
<div class="blip_description"></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:78%;">(demo video via  <a href="http://michaelverdi.com/index.php/2006/12/02/parallels-screencast">video blogger Michael Verdi</a> and <a href="http://blip.tv/file/109664?filename=MichaelVerdi-Parallels367.flv">blip.tv</a>) </span></div>
<p>Wowza&#8230; So&#8230; Parallels for Mac OS X has been out a for a bit. But it&#8217;s previously been best described as &#8220;&#8230;like VMware Workstation for a Mac.&#8221; In other words, cool, but nothing beyond VMware, and if VMware actually had a product out for OS X, then you&#8217;d probably grab <span style="font-style: italic;">that.</span></p>
<p>But last Friday Parallels released a new feature that is pretty compelling, and raises the bar for the concept of &#8220;abstraction.&#8221; Rather than having a parent window that hosts all of the guest OS&#8217;s windows, there is a &#8220;coherence mode&#8221; option that has each window of the guest OS appear as an individual window in the host OS, making itSO the experience of using an application in the either guest OS or host OS, is pretty darn similar. Certain keyboard commands and drag and drop is supported between the two environments. The video above demonstrates this better than all these words. Check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/12/04/parallels-to-vmware-its-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Fusion video! (More) virtualization for Mac OS X is close.</title>
		<link>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/11/30/vmware-fusion-video-more-virtualization-for-mac-os-x-is-close/</link>
		<comments>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/11/30/vmware-fusion-video-more-virtualization-for-mac-os-x-is-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesethingsmattertome.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMworld, virtualization software company VMware&#8217;s big conference was a few weeks ago.Among the stuff presented was VMware Fusion. Even though it&#8217;s not the first virtualization product for Mac OS X , it&#8217;s definitely the one people have been most excited about.
I&#8217;ll let the video do the talkin&#8217;.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/vmworld/">VMworld</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization">virtualization</a> software company <a href="http://www.vmware.com/">VMware</a>&#8217;s big conference was a few weeks ago.<br />Among the stuff presented was <a href="http://www.vmware.com/news/releases/mac.html">VMware Fusion</a>. Even though it&#8217;s not the first virtualization product for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X">Mac OS X</a> , it&#8217;s definitely the one people have been most excited about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let the video do the talkin&#8217;.</p>
<p><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_0hia6BxS0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_0hia6BxS0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></object></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesethingsmattertome.com/2006/11/30/vmware-fusion-video-more-virtualization-for-mac-os-x-is-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
